EPA Dramatically Weakens Radiation Protections

EPA has just issued (April 15, 2013) new Protective Action Guides (PAGs) for dealing with radioactive releases. The new PAGs are in many ways worse than the extremely weak PAGs Bush tried to push out in the last days of that Administration that Obama pulled back.  The PAGs eliminate requirements to evacuate people when thyroid or skin radiation doses exceed certain levels, lift a lifetime limit on radiation from such an event that would have triggered relocation, recommend dumping radioactive waste in municipal garbage dumps not designed for such waste, and propose five options for drinking water, all of which would dramatically increase the permitted concentrations of radioactivity in drinking water, by as much as 27,000 times.

Additionally, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) has published draft guidance for implementing the long-term cleanup portions of the PAGS.  The NCRP guidance would allow the public to be exposed to extraordinarily higher levels of radiation than previously permitted, sufficient to cause a cancer in every sixth person exposed.  Although public comments are supposedly being solicited, EPA has made the PAGs immediately effective, making the comment opportunity pretty meaningless.

  • Summary of EPA PAGs Weakening Radiation Protections
  • Letter criticizing NCRP guide for relaxing radiation protections, being sent to NCRP.
  • Critique by CBG, NIRS, PSR-LA, and SCFS of NCRP Draft Report on Late-Phase Recovery from Nuclear or Radiological Incidents

Read the CBG/NIRS press release:

EPA PAGs suggest permitting radioactive concentrations in drinking water orders of magnitude higher than EPA has long deemed acceptable pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water Act.  Below you will find two charts which detail the suggested concentrations.  You may view them in detail by clicking on them below:

Chart 1

Click the image to view the chart in detail

 

Chart 2

Click the chart to view the data in detail

 

CBG Powerpoint Presentation to Gina McCarthy (current EPA Administrator nominee) and other senior EPA officials opposing weakening of protections.

Summary of NCRP Proposals to Dramatically Increase Permissible Radioactive Contamination

Below you will find two charts which demonstrate the dramatic increase in permissible radioactive contamination, click on the images below to view the data in detail:

Click the chart to view the data in detail

Click the chart to view the data in detail

Click the chart to view the data in detail

Click the chart to view the data in detail

Read CBG’s Report on EPA’s PAGs:

Group Letters to EPA urging them not to relax radiation protections, i.e., to not take the action they have just now taken:

For more information, go to the Nuclear Information and Resource Service:  http://www.nirs.org/radiation/radstds/radstdshome.htm

Also see Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility:  http://www.peer.org/news/news-releases/2013/04/08/white-house-approves-radical-radiation-cleanup-rollback/

To read the EPA PAGs:   http://www.epa.gov/radiation/rert/pags.html
To read the NCRP report:  http://www.ncrponline.org

EPA Relaxes Public Health Guidelines For Radiological Attacks, Accidents

NTI reports on the Obama Administration’s efforts to deregulate the cleanup of nuclear accidents.

Watchdog Groups Blast White House-Backed Nuclear Cleanup Study

nextgov.com reports.

San Onofre’s Troubles Deepen

The San Francisco Chronicle reports that the repair costs for San Onofre are exploding.  Meantime, after years of employee complaints, KPBS reports that federal regulators are now looking into claims that San Onofre’s cyber-security training is outdated, at best.  The San Diego Union Tribune also reports that 70% power at San Onofre seems to be the “new norm.”

Federal Report Could Lead To Greater Cancer Risk at Dirty Bomb Sites

Global Security Newswire and the National Journal report:

People living near the site of a radiological attack could face greater cancer risks then what the government would normally allow if officials follow the anticipated recommendations of an upcoming report commissioned by the U.S. Homeland Security Department.

CBG’s Dan Hirsch calls the proposed lax standards “ethically indefensible.”

NRC’s Lax Dirty Bomb Cleanup Standards

A nuclear Katrina in the Making 1/11/2006

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) today issued guidelines for responding to a radiological “dirty” bomb that would permit doses to the public equivalent to tens of thousands of chest X-rays without requiring intervention and cleanup. The federal government estimates radiation doses that large would produce cancer or leukemia in a quarter of those exposed. (This is on top of the number of cancers that would occur in the absence of the extra radiation exposure.)