Hunters Point Publications:
Critique of the California Department of Public Health Work Plan for a Partial Gamma Survey of Parcel A-1 Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
This is one in a series of reports being prepared about the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard. In
early 2016, the Program on Environmental and Nuclear Policy at the University of California, Santa Cruz, initiated a project to review a series of issues associated with the cleanup of Hunters Point. Completion of that work was delayed by difficulties in getting necessary data and information from the Navy, EPA, and state agencies, and thus not completed by the time the Program’s Director, Daniel Hirsch, retired from the university in June 2017. Since then, Hirsch and a team of former and current UCSC students have continued to work on the matter, through a nonprofit organization, the Committee to Bridge the Gap.
Attachment – CBG Detailed Comments on Parcel G Retesting Work Plan
Committee to Bridge the Gap Critique of the Work Plan for Retesting of Parcel G Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
The Navy’s cleanup of the contaminated Hunters Point Naval Shipyard has been plagued with scandal. Its contractor for much of the radioactive work, Tetra Tech, has been found to have fabricated a huge portion of the radiation measurements.
Comments by the Committee to Bridge the Gap
Regarding the Navy’s Parcel F Proposed Plan for Offshore Sediment Cleanup Hunters Point Naval Shipyard Superfund Site
Click here for the comments: CBG_Parcel_F_Comments
The Hunters Point Naval Shipyard is one of the nation’s most contaminated sites.
Decades of poor environmental practices resulted in extensive pollution with radioactive
materials and toxic chemicals. Navy ships that had been exposed to high levels of nuclear
fallout by being placed near hydrogen bomb explosions in the Pacific were brought back to
Hunters Point for “decontamination.” Because radioactivity cannot be neutralized by such
mechanical means, decontamination in practice meant moving the contamination from the
ships to Hunters Point, contaminating soil, groundwater, and offshore sediments.
September 03, 2018
Comments by the Committee to Bridge the Gap, Physicians for Social Responsibility – Los Angeles and Southern California Federation of Scientists on the California State Land Commission’s Draft Environmental Impact Report for Decommissioning the San Onofre Nuclear Plant
September 20, 2017
Comments by the Committee to Bridge the Gap on the Department of Toxic Substances Control’s Proposed Regulations for Toxicity Criteria for Human Health Risk Assessment
DTSC Reference Number R-2016-8
CBG Toxicity Criteria Rule Comments (pdf)
DTSC Toxicity Criteria Excel Sheet Comparison (pdf)
Over 100 Groups Call on EPA to Withdraw Dramatically Weakened Radiation Guides
Read the group letter here.
EPA Dramatically Weakens Radiation Protections
Summary of EPA PAGs Weakening Radiation Protections
Letter criticizing NCRP guide for relaxing radiation protections, being sent to NCRP.
Critique by CBG, NIRS, PSR-LA, and SCFS of NCRP Draft Report on Late-Phase Recovery from Nuclear or Radiological Incidents
DOE Proposes Unrestricted Recycling of Radioactive Metals Into Consumer Goods
Read CBG’s letter to the Department of Energy here.
Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operations – Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Docket, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0689
Read our group letter here.
CBG & Other Organizations Oppose Petitions to NRC to Relax Radiation Protections and Declare Radiation Good For You
Comments to NRC Opposing Hormesis Petitions for Rulemaking
NRDC & CBG Comments LNT Docket 19 Nov 2015
Nuclear Cleanup: The Standards Conflict (2004)
Download Link (.pdf, 1.8mb)
The U.S. Department of Energy has recently violated a longstanding Joint DOE-EPA Policy which commits DOE to clean up all its nuclear facilities nationwide to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Superfund (CERCLA) standards. The focal point of this conflict between DOE and EPA cleanup standards is the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL), a 2800-acre facility on the Los Angeles-Ventura County line in Southern California.
(2001 debate over nuclear power)
Featured in Fellowship magazine, July/August 1978
Proposed Relaxation of EPA Drinking Water Standards for Radioactivity
Download link (.pdf, 6.6mb) October, 2008
In the waning days of the George W. Bush administration, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) drafted extraordinary new radiological standards for the governmental response to a wide range of radiological release events. Doug Guarino of the trade publication Inside EPA obtained a copy of the secret draft “Protective Action Guidance for Radiological Incidents,” dated August 2007 and marked “Please Do Not Distribute” and “Do Not Cite or Quote.” Mr. Guarino has written about the concerns the document has triggered within EPA and other state regulators.
In late 2008, it became clear to CBG that EPA was contemplating the issuance of the draft. In this report, we analyze this incredible proposal pushed by EPA leadership. CBG’s report specifically focuses on the proposal to allow the public to ingest drinking water with radioactive concentrations orders of magnitude higher than EPA’s longstanding radiological drinking water standards.
The Proposed Ward Valley Radioactive Waste Facility:
Papers Submitted to the National Academy of Sciences
Download link (.pdf, 3.3mb) October 12, 1994
Comprehensive radiation monitoring data for the US Ecology LLRW site at Beatty, Nevada, published in the last few days, provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the validity of optimistic transport models that have been used to predict travel times to groundwater in the tens of millennia. The newly available data show gross alpha readings in groundwater in excess of action levels in eight different years, gross beta in violation of action levels seven years, and tritium in excess ofaction levels four years, with significantly elevated tritium (>1,000 pCi/L) but below action levels an additional four years. The data provide clear evidence that radioactive materials have migratedfrom the disposal trenches 10 groundwater, 300 feet beneath the surface, in a few decades. The presence of elevated gross alpha, gross beta, and Cobalt-60 in the groundwater, in addition to substantial tritium, rule out vapor-phase migration. These empirical observations of rapid radionuclide migration contrast sharply with predictions by Prudic (1994) for Beatty and Ward Valley using Chloride Mass Balance calculations.
Contamination at the Beatty, Nevada, Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility (1996)
Download link (.pdf, 15.5mb) [Note: this is a very large file and will take time to download]
In the 1990s, contaminants were discovered outside US Ecology’s
radioactive waste facility near Beatty, Nevada, and all the way down to groundwater. In this report, we evaluate this discovery and its relevance to the now defunct proposal to dispose of radioactive waste at Ward Valley.
(2007 ABC News report)
SCRIPT: Radioactive Road Trip (Primetime)
Dirty Bombs: Dangerous Materials
KPHO news story