In this year’s newsletter, read about the Trump Administration and Boeing’s breakout from their prior SSFL Cleanup commitments. We also report on the latest on the “cleanup to coverup” at Hunter’s Point. We reflect on the massive amount of nuclear waste generated by just 50 years of operation of the San Onofre nuclear power plant. Finally, CBG’s Dan Hirsch reflects upon the contributions of a key 1970s CBG figure and staffer, and his continued impact on society.
Read the newsletter here.
The SF Chronicle reports:
A highly radioactive object has been discovered at the former Hunters Point Naval Shipyard next to a housing area that has been declared safe and free of radioactive contamination for more than a decade, The Chronicle has learned.
Click here to read the entire critique. (PDF warning)
Pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA, also known as Superfund), the Navy is required every Five-Years to review the
protectiveness of cleanup remedies at the Hunters Point Superfund site in light of current
information and knowledge. At the core of this requirement is the recognition that new
developments—e.g., evolving scientific findings about toxicity, tighter modern cleanup
standards, discoveries of failures of cleanup actions taken at a site—can mandate going back and undertaking more cleanup in order to protect public health and the environment . . . …
Click here to read the SF Chronicle’s report.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has excoriated the Navy’s plan to retest part of the former Hunters Point Naval Shipyard for radioactivity as inadequate and unscientific, threatening to pursue a rare dispute process if changes aren’t made, according to letters obtained by The Chronicle.